Foxhunting incident from Scottish Borders – some thoughts


A mounted fox hunt

A mounted fox hunt

Yesterday’s report by BBC Scotland featuring alleged criminal activity by a mounted fox hunt in the Scottish Borders must have disgusted all who watched it ( ) I for one was not surprised at the incident, filmed covertly by the League against Cruel Sports, as I have long suspected that this and other breaches of the law (criminal activity) is carried out regularly by some – or many – mounted hunts; this was just additional proof. In this case two men have been charged under the Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Act 2002 by Police Scotland.

While I have no objection to fox control – as opposed to the completely different ‘sport’ of hunting foxes with hounds and riders – I wonder just how effective and necessary it is. The study by David Macdonald of Bristol University  in his book Running with the Fox is one of many studies of vulpine ecology and shows that social factors in a fox group are probably the main influence on fox numbers, with only the dominant pair being the most likely to breed.  The same conclusion is reached in a later study by IFAW, Bristol University and York University ( ) Backing this up to a degree are reports from gamekeepers who have told me they shoot or snare a particular number of foxes every year on the estate where they work. One shot 40 a year on the hill land he was responsible for. If this is fox control why was the number not lessening every year as one would expect? The answer of course is that he was creating a vacuum which was filled in probably as quickly as he was making the vacancies. I did wonder why he bothered at all as the estate reared very few pheasants. Extra time on good husbandry might have been better use of the time, and in any case there was a huge rabbit population on the hill which would be by far the main food supply of the foxes in any case.

There is no doubt that some sheep and poultry keepers can have bother with foxes but again good husbandry – simple things like ensuring poultry flocks are inside at night and bringing lambs inside during their first week or so of their life – can limit predation.  In any case this is also the kind of situation where the public is likely to have little objection to the shooting of a particularly determined fox.

But back to the criminal activity associated with some fox hunting.  I have no intention on discussing the sub-judicae case filmed by LACS but I have strong views on the lack of ethics of some hunts, particularly of their so-called terrier-men. In Scotland the Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Act 2002 has as its principal offence: A person who deliberately hunts a wild mammal with a dog commits an offence. There are numerous exceptions in the Act, including using a dog under control to flush a fox from cover above ground but only if that person acts to ensure that, once the fox is found or emerges from cover, it is shot, or killed by a bird of prey, once it is safe to do so.

A further exception states, ‘Where a person is using a dog in connection with the despatch of a fox with the intention of flushing it from cover or from below ground in order that it may be shot or killed by lawful means, that person does not commit an offence by virtue of the dog killing the fox in the course of that activity. In my view this exception is to facilitate the control of foxes in dens at cubbing time, where the vixen occasionally may be killed underground by the dog rather than bolt to waiting guns. I have the view that this is during fox control rather than during the ‘sport’ of hunting with hounds and horses. It seems fair to me that if a fox being hunted for ‘sport’ manages to take refuge in a den or safe place elsewhere rather than run through a line of guns and is shot then it has won the day and should be left in peace. At best – and which again puts paid to the argument by fox hunters that they are involved in fox control rather than a jolly day out – when the fox is bolted by the terrier it is then shot as it does so. I doubt, however, that this will feature in Lord Bonomy’s report when he reviews the 2002 Act.

Irrespective of any court outcome which emanates from the LACS filming of this incident, fox hunting with horses and hounds has done itself irreparable harm and may well be a step closer to a complete ban in Scotland and a quiet withdrawal of the Tory desire in the rest of the UK to reverse the current limitations on hunting under the Hunting Act 2004.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Foxhunting incident from Scottish Borders – some thoughts

  1. Barry says:

    Hi Alan is hunting rabbits with dogs still legal in scotland seen a few pictures on social media of people hunting with dogs for rabbits on outskirts of dundee.Thanks barry

  2. JW (@jw4926) says:

    We are reading from the same hymn sheet Alan …..
    Many years ago I looked after 500 or so ewes for several years for an absentee farmer. I didn’t lose one lamb to predation in all that time. Indeed, I had a dog fox regularly come for green tripe (this was before the BSE furore) – I had bassets then – and he knew the day that I went to the abbattoir on a weekly basis and would be awaiting his share upon my return home.

    • Sometimes those who do things by tradition need to stand back and consider if the end really justifies the means. As my article said I’m not against some fox control, though I feel it needs to be targeted at a problem individual rather than broad-brush.

  3. Barry says:

    “I did wonder why he bothered at all as the estate reared very few pheasants. Extra time on good husbandry might have been better use of the time, and in any case there was a huge rabbit population on the hill which would be by far the main food supply of the foxes in any case.”

    This statement above baffles me ??? What about the lapwings, curlew, grouse, etc, etc that this keeper is also helping with his fox control. Don’t think for one minute that rabbits are the only thing on the foxes menu !! Taking sitting hen birds on nests makes for an easier meal for a fox than stalking and chasing rabbits in the hope of catching one !!!!

    • As you’ll see from my post I’m not against fox control per se. What I questioned was whether it really has a benefit or is it simply tradition. Scientific papers allege that fox control for conservation does not always make the difference expected. I love seeing waders, particularly lapwings, but by far the biggest threat to them at nesting time is through agricultural operations, not predators. Neither am I knocking the good work that many keepers and shooting estates carry out (see my book A Wealth of Wildlife – a year on a Highland Perthshire estate) it’s just a pity that some tarnish the name of gamekeeping by their illegal activity.

      • Barry says:

        I totally agree with you, but in every profession there are ones who don’t abide by rules and regulations. I know you aren’t against what we do but I felt as though you contradicted yourself slightly in this article, that’s all. Very interesting reading though, not just this article but others from you.

  4. Thanks Barry
    You’ll gather though that I disagree entirely with mounted fox hunting

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s